| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in OpenText™ Carbonite Safe Server Backup allows Code Injection.
The vulnerability could be exploited through an open port, potentially allowing unauthorized access.
This issue affects Carbonite Safe Server Backup: through 6.8.3. |
| An issue in deep-diver LLM-As-Chatbot before commit 99c2c03 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the modelsbyom.py component. |
| Command injection when ingesting a remote Kaggle dataset due to a lack of input sanitization in the ingest_kaggle() API |
| An issue was discovered in seeyonOA version 8, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the importProcess method in WorkFlowDesignerController.class component. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in pdf2json v0.70 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the GString::copy() and ImgOutputDev::ImgOutputDev function. |
| The Product Table by WBW plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1 via the 'saveCustomTitle' function. This is due to missing authorization and lack of sanitization of appended data in the languages/customTitle.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server. |
| In IDF v0.10.0-0C03-03 and ZLF v0.10.0-0C03-04, a configuration error has been detected in cross-origin resource sharing (CORS). Exploiting this vulnerability requires authenticating to the device and executing certain commands that can only be executed with permissions higher than the view permission. |
| Shrubbery tac_plus 2.x, 3.x. and 4.x through F4.0.4.28 allows unauthenticated Remote Command Execution. The product allows users to configure authorization checks as shell commands through the tac_plus.cfg configuration file. These are executed when a client sends an authorization request with a username that has pre-authorization directives configured. However, it is possible to inject additional commands into these checks because strings from TACACS+ packets are used as command-line arguments. If the installation lacks a a pre-shared secret (there is no pre-shared secret by default), then the injection can be triggered without authentication. (The attacker needs to know a username configured to use a pre-authorization command.) NOTE: this is related to CVE-2023-45239 but the issue is in the original Shrubbery product, not Meta's fork. |
| ComfyUI-Ace-Nodes is vulnerable to Code Injection. The ACE_ExpressionEval node contains an eval() in its entrypoint function that accepts arbitrary user-controlled data. A user can create a workflow that results in executing arbitrary code on the server. |
| Codigo Markdown Editor 1.0.1 contains a code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to run arbitrary system commands by crafting a malicious markdown file. Attackers can embed a video source with an onerror event that executes shell commands through Node.js child_process module when the file is opened. |
| Maple versions up to and including 13's Maplet framework allows embedded commands to be executed automatically when a .maplet file is opened. This behavior bypasses standard security restrictions that normally prevent code execution in regular Maple worksheets. The vulnerability enables attackers to craft malicious .maplet files that execute arbitrary code without user interaction. |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Progress DataDirect Connect for JDBC drivers, Progress DataDirect Open Access JDBC driver and Hybrid Data Pipeline allows Remote Code Inclusion.
The SpyAttribute connection option implemented by the DataDirect Connect for JDBC drivers, DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline JDBC driver and the DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC driver log=(file) construct allows the user to specify an arbitrary file for the JDBC driver to write its log information to. If an application allows an end user to specify a value for the SpyAttributes connection option then an attacker could cause java script to be written to a log file. If the log file was in the correct location with the correct extension, an application server could see that log file as a resource to be served. The attacker could fetch the resource from the server causing the java script to be executed.
This issue affects:
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Amazon Redshift: through 6.0.0.001392, fixed in 6.0.0.001541
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache Cassandra: through 6.0.0.000805, fixed in 6.0.0.000833
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Hive: through 6.0.1.001499, fixed in 6.0.1.001628
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache Impala: through 6.0.0.001155, fixed in 6.0.0.001279
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache SparkSQL: through 6.0.1.001222, fixed in 6.0.1.001344
DataDirect Connect for JDBC Autonomous REST Connector: through 6.0.1.006961, fixed in 6.0.1.007063
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for DB2: through 6.0.0.000717, fixed in 6.0.0.000964
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Google Analytics 4: through 6.0.0.000454, fixed in 6.0.0.000525
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Google BigQuery: through 6.0.0.002279, fixed in 6.0.0.002410
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Greenplum: through 6.0.0.001712, fixed in 6.0.0.001727
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Informix: through 6.0.0.000690, fixed in 6.0.0.0851
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft Dynamics 365: through 6.0.0.003161, fixed in 6.0.0.3198
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft SQLServer: through 6.0.0.001936, fixed in 6.0.0.001957
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft Sharepoint: through 6.0.0.001559, fixed in 6.0.0.001587
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for MongoDB: through 6.1.0.001654, fixed in 6.1.0.001669
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for MySQL: through 5.1.4.000330, fixed in 5.1.4.000364
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Database: through 6.0.0.001747, fixed in 6.0.0.001776
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Eloqua: through 6.0.0.001438, fixed in 6.0.0.001458
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Sales Cloud: through 6.0.0.001225, fixed in 6.0.0.001316
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Service Cloud: through 5.1.4.000298, fixed in 5.1.4.000309
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for PostgreSQL: through 6.0.0.001843, fixed in 6.0.0.001856
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Progress OpenEdge: through 5.1.4.000187, fixed in 5.1.4.000189
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Salesforce: through 6.0.0.003020, fixed in 6.0.0.003125
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for SAP HANA: through 6.0.0.000879, product retired
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for SAP S/4 HANA: through 6.0.1.001818, fixed in 6.0.1.001858
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Sybase ASE: through 5.1.4.000161, fixed in 5.1.4.000162
DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Snowflake: through 6.0.1.001821, fixed in 6.0.1.001856
DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline Server: through 4.6.2.3309, fixed in 4.6.2.3430
DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline JDBC Driver: through 4.6.2.0607, fixed in 4.6.2.1023
DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline On Premises Connector: through 4.6.2.1223, fixed in 4.6.2.1339
DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline Docker: through 4.6.2.3316, fixed in 4.6.2.3430
DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC Driver: through 8.1.0.0177, fixed in 8.1.0.0183
DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC Driver: through 9.0.0.0019, fixed in 9.0.0.0022 |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Hanzhou Haobo network management system 1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted script. |
| The The Back In Stock Notifier for WooCommerce | WooCommerce Waitlist Pro plugin for WordPress for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 5.3.1. This is due to the plugin for WordPress allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes. |
| An issue in H3C Technologies Co., Limited H3C Magic RC3000 RC3000V100R009 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Routing functionality. |
| A
CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability exists that could cause remote
command execution by a privileged account when the server is accessed via a console and through
exploitation of the hostname input. |
| A vulnerability was found in Beijing Longda Jushang Technology DBShop商城系统 3.3 Release 231225. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /home-order. The manipulation of the argument orderStatus with the input %22%3E%3Csvg%20onload=alert(5888)%3E leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Claro A7600-A1 RNR4-A72T-2x16_v2110403_CLA_32_160817. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /form2pingv6.cgi of the component Ping6 Diagnóstico. The manipulation of the argument ip6addr with the input <img/src/onerror=prompt(8)> leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Mangati NovoSGA up to 2.2.9. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /admin of the component SVG File Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument logoNavbar/logoLogin results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. |
| An HTML injection vulnerability in Amidaware Inc Tactical RMM v1.3.1 and earlier allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary HTML content during the creation of a new agent via the POST /api/v3/newagent/ endpoint. The agent_id parameter accepts up to 255 characters and is improperly sanitized using DOMPurify.sanitize() with the html: true option enabled, which fails to adequately filter HTML input. The injected HTML is rendered in the Tactical RMM management panel when an administrator attempts to remove or shut down the affected agent, potentially leading to client-side attacks such as UI manipulation or phishing. NOTE: the Supplier's position is that this has incorrect information. |
