Total
8623 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-24540 | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SeedProd Coming Soon Page, Under Construction & Maintenance Mode by SeedProd allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Coming Soon Page, Under Construction & Maintenance Mode by SeedProd: from n/a through 6.18.9. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27968 | 1 Optimole | 1 Super Page Cache | 2025-02-12 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Optimole Super Page Cache for Cloudflare allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Super Page Cache for Cloudflare: from n/a through 4.7.5. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2552 | 1 Bumsys Project | 1 Bumsys | 2025-02-12 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository unilogies/bumsys prior to 2.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4426 | 1 Comparisonslider | 1 Comparison Slider | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Comparison Slider plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions hooked to AJAX actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change slider titles, delete sliders and modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3943 | 1 Delower | 1 Wp To Do | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_addcomment function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add comments to to do items via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3945 | 1 Delower | 1 Wp To Do | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_manage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add new todo items via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3947 | 1 Delower | 1 Wp To Do | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31378 | 1 Mailmunch | 1 Mailchimp Forms | 2025-02-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MailMunch MailChimp Forms by MailMunch.This issue affects MailChimp Forms by MailMunch: from n/a through 3.2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51369 | 1 Sysbasics | 1 Customize My Account | 2025-02-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SysBasics Customize My Account for WooCommerce.This issue affects Customize My Account for WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.8.3. | ||||
| CVE-2020-19803 | 1 Doyocms Project | 1 Doyocms | 2025-02-11 | 8.8 High |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability found in Milken DoyoCMS v.2.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the background system settings. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25411 | 1 Aten | 2 Pe8108, Pe8108 Firmware | 2025-02-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| Aten PE8108 2.4.232 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2024-48962 | 1 Apache | 1 Ofbiz | 2025-02-11 | 8.8 High |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'), Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), : Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.17. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.17, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24900 | 2025-02-11 | 8.6 High | ||
| Concorde, formerly know as Nexkey, is a fork of the federated microblogging platform Misskey. Due to a lack of CSRF countermeasures and improper settings of cookies for MediaProxy authentication, there is a vulnerability that allows MediaProxy authentication to be bypassed. In versions prior to 12.25Q1.1, the authentication cookie does not have the SameSite attribute. This allows an attacker to bypass MediaProxy authentication and load any image without restrictions under certain circumstances. In versions prior to 12.24Q2.3, this cookie was also used to authenticate the job queue management page (bull-board), so bull-board authentication is also bypassed. This may enable attacks that have a significant impact on availability and integrity. The affected versions are too old to be covered by this advisory, but the maintainers of Concorde strongly recommend not using older versions. Version 12.25Q1.1 contains a patch. There is no effective workaround other than updating. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28848 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 User Oidc | 2025-02-11 | 4.8 Medium |
| user_oidc is the OIDC connect user backend for Nextcloud, an open source collaboration platform. A vulnerability in versions 1.0.0 until 1.3.0 effectively allowed an attacker to bypass the state protection as they could just copy the expected state token from the first request to their second request. Users should upgrade user_oidc to 1.3.0 to receive a patch for the issue. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27520 | 1 Epson | 240 Esifnw1, Esifnw1 Firmware, Esnsb1 and 237 more | 2025-02-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SEIKO EPSON printers/network interface Web Config allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication and perform unintended operations by having a logged-in user view a malicious page. [Note] Web Config is the software that allows users to check the status and change the settings of SEIKO EPSON printers/network interface via a web browser. According to SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, it is also called as Remote Manager in some products. Web Config is pre-installed in some printers/network interface provided by SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION. For the details of the affected product names/model numbers, refer to the information provided by the vendor. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23985 | 2025-02-10 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brainvireinfo Dynamic URL SEO allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Dynamic URL SEO: from n/a through 1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24549 | 2025-02-10 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mahbubur Rahman Post Meta allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects Post Meta: from n/a through 1.0.9. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29003 | 1 Svelte | 1 Sveltekit | 2025-02-10 | 8.8 High |
| SvelteKit is a web development framework. The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a `+server.js` file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods. SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, prior to version 1.15.1, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different `Content-Type` header value. If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts. SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the `is_form_content_type` function call in the CSRF protection logic to include `text/plain`. As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on `PUT`, `PATCH` and `DELETE` methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to protect users who have put in some sort of `?_method= override` feature themselves in their `handle` hook, so that the request that resolve sees could be `PUT`/`PATCH`/`DELETE` when the browser issues a `POST` request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2449 | 1 Progress | 1 Loadmaster | 2025-02-10 | 7.5 High |
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability has been identified in LoadMaster. It is possible for a malicious actor, who has prior knowledge of the IP or hostname of a specific LoadMaster, to direct an authenticated LoadMaster administrator to a third-party site. In such a scenario, the CSRF payload hosted on the malicious site would execute HTTP transactions on behalf of the LoadMaster administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31238 | 1 Zaytech | 1 Smart Online Order For Clover | 2025-02-10 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zaytech Smart Online Order for Clover.This issue affects Smart Online Order for Clover: from n/a through 1.5.5. | ||||