| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability was found in mingyuefusu 明月复苏 tushuguanlixitong 图书管理系统 up to d4836f6b49cd0ac79a4021b15ce99ff7229d4694 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Emergency Responder could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a CSRF attack, which could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient protections for the web UI of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user, such as deleting users from the device. |
| Broken Access Control vulnerability in Nickolas Bossinas WordPress File Upload allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WordPress File Upload: from n/a through 4.24.7. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/index.php in RazorCMS 1.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete arbitrary web pages via a showcats action. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Novell iManager 2.7 before SP6 Patch 1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users by leveraging improper request validation by iManager code deployed within an Apache Tomcat container. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Atmail Webmail Server before 7.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add user accounts, (2) modify user accounts, (3) delete user accounts, or (4) stop the product's service. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Shareaholic SexyBookmarks plugin 6.1.4.0 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that "manipulate plugin settings." |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Maintenance Mode plugin before 1.8.8 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify this plugin's settings. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in application/modules/admin/controllers/users.php in Tomaz Muraus Open Blog 1.2.1, and possibly earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests to admin/users/edit that grant administrative privileges. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the IndiaNIC Testimonial plugin 2.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a testimonial via an iNIC_testimonial_save action; (2) add a listing template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_listing_template action; (3) add a widget template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_widget action; insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (4) project_name, (5) project_url, (6) client_name, (7) client_city, (8) client_state, (9) description, (10) tags, (11) video_url, or (12) is_featured, (13) title, (14) widget_title, (15) no_of_testimonials, (16) filter_by_country, (17) filter_by_tags, or (18) widget_template parameter to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Office before 8.1.6 and 9.x before 9.3.0, Cybozu Dezie before 8.0.7, and Cybozu Mailwise before 5.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change passwords. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in administration/admins.php in Ad Manager Pro (aka AdManagerPro) 3.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative users via an admin_created action. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the LocalFiles Editor plugin in Piwigo before 2.4.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create arbitrary PHP files via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web-based management utility on the NEC AtermWR9500N, AtermWR8600N, AtermWR8370N, AtermWR8160N, AtermWM3600R, and AtermWM3450RN routers allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) initialize settings or (2) reboot the device. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security AppScan Enterprise 5.6 and 8.x before 8.7 and IBM Rational Policy Tester 5.6 and 8.x before 8.5.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that cause a denial of service via malformed HTTP data. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webadmin.nsf (aka the Web Administrator client) in IBM Domino 8.5.x allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of administrators. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in e107_admin/newspost.php in e107 1.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct XSS attacks via the news_title parameter in a create action. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in user/messageselect.php in the messaging system in Moodle 2.2.x before 2.2.7, 2.3.x before 2.3.4, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that send course messages. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management console (openshift-console/app/controllers/application_controller.rb) in OpenShift 0.0.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Time Spent module 6.x and 7.x for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
