Total
8416 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-55057 | 1 Maxum | 1 Rumpus | 2025-11-24 | 4.5 Medium |
| Multiple CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) | ||||
| CVE-2025-13177 | 2 Bdtask, Codecanyon | 2 Saleserp, Saleserp | 2025-11-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in Bdtask/CodeCanyon SalesERP up to 20250728. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13179 | 1 Bdtask | 2 Wholesale, Wholesale Inventory Control And Inventory Management System | 2025-11-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Bdtask/CodeCanyon Wholesale Inventory Control and Inventory Management System up to 20250320. This issue affects some unknown processing. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62346 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Glovius Cloud | 2025-11-24 | 6.8 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66064 | 2 Rafflepress, Wordpress | 3 Giveaways And Contests, Giveaways And Contests By Rafflepress, Wordpress | 2025-11-24 | 5.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Syed Balkhi Giveaways and Contests by RafflePress rafflepress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Giveaways and Contests by RafflePress: from n/a through <= 1.12.20. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66097 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Igor Jerosimić I Order Terms i-order-terms allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects I Order Terms: from n/a through <= 1.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5455 | 3 Fedoraproject, Freeipa, Redhat | 25 Fedora, Freeipa, Codeready Linux Builder and 22 more | 2025-11-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63955 | 1 Phpgurukul | 1 Student Record System | 2025-11-20 | 7.5 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the manage-students.php component of PHPGurukul Student Record System v3.2 allows an attacker to trick an authenticated administrator into submitting a forged request. This leads to the unauthorized deletion of user accounts, causing a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2025-12535 | 2 Brainstormforce, Wordpress | 2 Sureforms, Wordpress | 2025-11-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| The SureForms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.1. This is due to the plugin distributing generic WordPress REST API nonces (wp_rest) to unauthenticated users via the 'wp_ajax_nopriv_rest-nonce' action. While the plugin legitimately needs to support unauthenticated form submissions, it incorrectly uses generic REST nonces instead of form-specific nonces. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass CSRF protection on REST API endpoints that rely solely on nonce verification without additional authentication checks, allowing them to trigger unauthorized actions such as the plugin's own post-submission hooks and potentially other plugins' REST endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60075 | 2 Allegro Marketing, Wordpress | 2 Hpb Seo Plugin For Wordpress, Wordpress | 2025-11-19 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Allegro Marketing hpb seo plugin for WordPress hpbseo allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects hpb seo plugin for WordPress: from n/a through <= 3.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12406 | 2 Awensley, Wordpress | 2 Project Honey Pot Spam Trap, Wordpress | 2025-11-19 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Project Honey Pot Spam Trap plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the printAdminPage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12173 | 2 Winkm89, Wordpress | 2 Wp Admin Microblog, Wordpress | 2025-11-19 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP Admin Microblog plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'wp-admin-microblog' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send messages on behalf of an administrator via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6670 | 1 Wso2 | 10 Org.wso2.carbon Org.wso2.carbon.ui, Wso2 Api Control Plane, Wso2 Api Manager and 7 more | 2025-11-18 | 8.8 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to the use of the HTTP GET method for state-changing operations within admin services, specifically in the event processor of the Carbon console. Although the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is used as a mitigation, it is ineffective in this context because it allows cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigations using GET requests. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability by tricking an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link, leading the browser to issue unintended state-changing requests. Successful exploitation could result in unauthorized operations such as data modification, account changes, or other administrative actions. According to WSO2 Secure Production Guidelines, exposure of Carbon console services to untrusted networks is discouraged, which may reduce the impact in properly secured deployments. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63712 | 2 Senior-walter, Sourcecodester | 2 Web-based Pharmacy Product Management System, Product Expiry Management System | 2025-11-18 | 4.5 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in SourceCodester Product Expiry Management System. The User Management module (delete-user.php) allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary user accounts via forged cross-origin GET requests because the endpoint relies solely on session cookies and lacks CSRF protection. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9625 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Coil Web Monetization plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the coil-get-css-selector parameter handling in the maybe_restrict_content function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger CSS selector detection functionality via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12404 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-18 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Like-it plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the likeit_conf() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12827 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Top Friends plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the top_friends_options_subpanel() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13282 | 1 Chunghwa Telecom | 1 Tenderdoctransfer | 2025-11-18 | 8.1 High |
| TenderDocTransfer developed by Chunghwa Telecom has a Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13283 | 1 Chunghwa Telecom | 1 Tenderdoctransfer | 2025-11-18 | 7.1 High |
| TenderDocTransfer developed by Chunghwa Telecom has a Arbitrary File Copy and Paste vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability. Attackers can copy arbitrary files on the user's system and paste them into any path, which poses a potential risk of information leakage or could consume hard drive space by copying files in large volumes. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63717 | 2 Mayurik, Sourcecodester | 2 Pet Grooming Management Software, Pet Grooming Management Software | 2025-11-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| The change password functionality at /pet_grooming/admin/change_pass.php in SourceCodester Pet Grooming Management Software 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. The application does not implement adequate anti-CSRF tokens or same-site cookie restrictions, allowing attackers to trick authenticated users into unknowingly changing their passwords. | ||||