| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| D-Link DI-8300 v16.07.26A1 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the ip parameter in the ip_position_asp function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. |
| D-Link DI-8300 v16.07.26A1 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the fx parameter in the jingx_asp function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the iface parameter in the /wan_line_detection.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the s parameter in the /web_list_opt.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 and DI-8003G 19.12.10A1 due to improper handling of the wan_ping parameter in the /wan_ping.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of parameters in the /xwgl_bwr.asp endpoint. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP GET request in the name, qq, and time parameters. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of parameters in the /yyxz_dlink.asp endpoint. |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 9.5.0.0 through 9.10.1.6 and versions 9.11.0.0 through 9.13.0.0, contains a generation of error message containing sensitive information vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) in Kibana One Workflow can lead to information disclosure. An authenticated user with workflow creation and execution privileges can bypass host allowlist restrictions in the Workflows Execution Engine, potentially exposing sensitive internal endpoints and data. |
| LiquidJS is a Shopify / GitHub Pages compatible template engine in pure JavaScript. Prior to 10.25.3, the replace filter in LiquidJS incorrectly accounts for memory usage when the memoryLimit option is enabled. It charges str.length + pattern.length + replacement.length bytes to the memory limiter, but the actual output from str.split(pattern).join(replacement) can be quadratically larger when the pattern occurs many times in the input string. This allows an attacker who controls template content to bypass the memoryLimit DoS protection with approximately 2,500x amplification, potentially causing out-of-memory conditions. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.25.3. |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists in React Server Components, affecting the following packages: react-server-dom-parcel, react-server-dom-turbopack and react-server-dom-webpack (versions 19.0.0 through 19.0.4, 19.1.0 through 19.1.5, and 19.2.0 through 19.2.4). The vulnerability is triggered by sending specially crafted HTTP requests to Server Function endpoints.The payload of the HTTP request causes excessive CPU usage for up to a minute ending in a thrown error that is catchable. |
| LiquidJS is a Shopify / GitHub Pages compatible template engine in pure JavaScript. Prior to 10.25.3, for {% include %}, {% render %}, and {% layout %}, LiquidJS checks whether the candidate path is inside the configured partials or layouts roots before reading it. That check is path-based, not realpath-based. Because of that, a file like partials/link.liquid passes the directory containment check as long as its pathname is under the allowed root. If link.liquid is actually a symlink to a file outside the allowed root, the filesystem follows the symlink when the file is opened and LiquidJS renders the external target. So the restriction is applied to the path string that was requested, not to the file that is actually read. This matters in environments where an attacker can place templates or otherwise influence files under a trusted template root, including uploaded themes, extracted archives, mounted content, or repository-controlled template trees. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.25.3. |
| LiquidJS is a Shopify / GitHub Pages compatible template engine in pure JavaScript. Prior to 10.25.3, liquidjs 10.25.0 documents root as constraining filenames passed to renderFile() and parseFile(), but top-level file loads do not enforce that boundary. A Liquid instance configured with an empty temporary directory as root can return the contents of arbitrary files. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.25.3. |
| Frappe Learning Management System (LMS) is a learning system that helps users structure their content. Prior to 2.46.0, a vulnerability has been identified in Frappe Learning where quiz scores can be modified by students before submission. The application currently relies on client-side calculated scores, which can be altered using browser developer tools prior to sending the submission request. While this does not allow modification of other users’ data or privilege escalation, it compromises the integrity of quiz results and undermines academic reliability. This issue affects data integrity but does not expose confidential information or allow unauthorized access to other accounts. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.46.0. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| An eval() injection vulnerability in the Rapid7 Insight Agent beaconing logic for Linux versions could theoretically allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution as root via a crafted beacon response. Because the Agent uses mutual TLS (mTLS) to verify commands from the Rapid7 Platform, it is unlikely that the eval() function could be exploited remotely without prior, highly privileged access to the backend platform. |
| Transient DOS when receiving a service data frame with excessive length during device matching over a neighborhood awareness network protocol connection. |
| If a BIND resolver is performing DNSSEC validation and encounters a maliciously crafted zone, the resolver may consume excessive CPU. Authoritative-only servers are generally unaffected, although there are circumstances where authoritative servers may make recursive queries (see: https://kb.isc.org/docs/why-does-my-authoritative-server-make-recursive-queries).
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.46, 9.20.0 through 9.20.20, 9.21.0 through 9.21.19, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.46-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.20-S1. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: atm: fix crash due to unvalidated vcc pointer in sigd_send()
Reproducer available at [1].
The ATM send path (sendmsg -> vcc_sendmsg -> sigd_send) reads the vcc
pointer from msg->vcc and uses it directly without any validation. This
pointer comes from userspace via sendmsg() and can be arbitrarily forged:
int fd = socket(AF_ATMSVC, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
ioctl(fd, ATMSIGD_CTRL); // become ATM signaling daemon
struct msghdr msg = { .msg_iov = &iov, ... };
*(unsigned long *)(buf + 4) = 0xdeadbeef; // fake vcc pointer
sendmsg(fd, &msg, 0); // kernel dereferences 0xdeadbeef
In normal operation, the kernel sends the vcc pointer to the signaling
daemon via sigd_enq() when processing operations like connect(), bind(),
or listen(). The daemon is expected to return the same pointer when
responding. However, a malicious daemon can send arbitrary pointer values.
Fix this by introducing find_get_vcc() which validates the pointer by
searching through vcc_hash (similar to how sigd_close() iterates over
all VCCs), and acquires a reference via sock_hold() if found.
Since struct atm_vcc embeds struct sock as its first member, they share
the same lifetime. Therefore using sock_hold/sock_put is sufficient to
keep the vcc alive while it is being used.
Note that there may be a race with sigd_close() which could mark the vcc
with various flags (e.g., ATM_VF_RELEASED) after find_get_vcc() returns.
However, sock_hold() guarantees the memory remains valid, so this race
only affects the logical state, not memory safety.
[1]: https://gist.github.com/mrpre/1ba5949c45529c511152e2f4c755b0f3 |