Total
714 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-6011 | 1 Hashicorp | 2 Vault, Vault Enterprise | 2025-08-13 | 3.7 Low |
| A timing side channel in Vault and Vault Enterprise’s (“Vault”) userpass auth method allowed an attacker to distinguish between existing and non-existing users, and potentially enumerate valid usernames for Vault’s Userpass auth method. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.20.1 and Vault Enterprise 1.20.1, 1.19.7, 1.18.12, and 1.16.23. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30308 | 1 Ruijie | 14 Rg-eg105g, Rg-eg105g Firmware, Rg-eg105g V2 and 11 more | 2025-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue discovered in Ruijie EG210G-P, Ruijie EG105G-V2, Ruijie NBR, and Ruijie EG105G routers allows attackers to hijack TCP sessions which could lead to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42016 | 1 Siemens | 54 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I801, Ruggedcom I802 and 51 more | 2025-08-12 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100F, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200F, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969F, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400F, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416F, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PF, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900F, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GF, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. A timing attack, in a third-party component, could make the retrieval of the private key possible, used for encryption of sensitive data. If a threat actor were to exploit this, the data integrity and security could be compromised. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47872 | 1 Eg4 Electronics | 7 Eg4 12000xp, Eg4 12kpv, Eg4 18kpv and 4 more | 2025-08-12 | 5.8 Medium |
| The public-facing product registration endpoint server responds differently depending on whether the S/N is valid and unregistered, valid but already registered, or does not exist in the database. Combined with the fact that serial numbers are sequentially assigned, this allows an attacker to gain information on the product registration status of different S/Ns. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26062 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Computing System | 2025-08-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Integrated Management Controller could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to enumerate valid usernames within the vulnerable application. The vulnerability is due to differences in authentication responses sent back from the application as part of an authentication attempt. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending authentication requests to the affected application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to confirm the names of administrative user accounts for use in further attacks.There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24391 | 1 Otrs | 1 Otrs | 2025-07-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the External Interface of OTRS allows conclusions to be drawn about the existence of user accounts through different HTTP response codes and messages. This enables an attacker to systematically identify valid email addresses. This issue affects: * OTRS 7.0.X * OTRS 8.0.X * OTRS 2023.X * OTRS 2024.X * OTRS 2025.X | ||||
| CVE-2024-32926 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-22 | 5.5 Medium |
| there is a possible information disclosure due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26939 | 1 Bouncycastle | 2 Fips Java Api, Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle | 2025-07-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Legion of the Bouncy Castle BC before 1.61 and BC-FJA before 1.0.1.2, attackers can obtain sensitive information about a private exponent because of Observable Differences in Behavior to Error Inputs. This occurs in org.bouncycastle.crypto.encodings.OAEPEncoding. Sending invalid ciphertext that decrypts to a short payload in the OAEP Decoder could result in the throwing of an early exception, potentially leaking some information about the private exponent of the RSA private key performing the encryption. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6386 | 1 Parisneo | 1 Lollms | 2025-07-13 | N/A |
| The parisneo/lollms repository is affected by a timing attack vulnerability in the `authenticate_user` function within the `lollms_authentication.py` file. This vulnerability allows attackers to enumerate valid usernames and guess passwords incrementally by analyzing response time differences. The affected version is the latest, and the issue is resolved in version 20.1. The vulnerability arises from the use of Python's default string equality operator for password comparison, which compares characters sequentially and exits on the first mismatch, leading to variable response times based on the number of matching initial characters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11084 | 1 Perforce | 1 Helix Alm | 2025-07-13 | N/A |
| Helix ALM prior to 2025.1 returns distinct error responses during authentication, allowing an attacker to determine whether a username exists. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12663 | 1 Funnyzpc | 1 Mee-admin | 2025-07-12 | 3.7 Low |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in funnyzpc Mee-Admin up to 1.6. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /mee/login of the component Login. The manipulation of the argument username leads to observable response discrepancy. The attack can be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47057 | 1 Mautic | 1 Mautic | 2025-07-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| SummaryThis advisory addresses a security vulnerability in Mautic related to the "Forget your password" functionality. This vulnerability could be exploited by unauthenticated users to enumerate valid usernames. User Enumeration via Timing Attack: A user enumeration vulnerability exists in the "Forget your password" functionality. Differences in response times for existing and non-existing users, combined with a lack of request limiting, allow an attacker to determine the existence of usernames through a timing-based attack. MitigationPlease update to a version that addresses this timing vulnerability, where password reset responses are normalized to respond at the same time regardless of user existence. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24506 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Symantec Privileged Access Management | 2025-07-12 | N/A |
| A specific authentication strategy allows to learn ids of PAM users associated with certain authentication types. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50383 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2025-07-10 | 5.9 Medium |
| Botan before 3.6.0, when certain GCC versions are used, has a compiler-induced secret-dependent operation in lib/utils/donna128.h in donna128 (used in Chacha-Poly1305 and x25519). An addition can be skipped if a carry is not set. This was observed for GCC 11.3.0 with -O2 on MIPS, and GCC on x86-i386. (Only 32-bit processors can be affected.) | ||||
| CVE-2024-50382 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2025-07-10 | 5.9 Medium |
| Botan before 3.6.0, when certain LLVM versions are used, has compiler-induced secret-dependent control flow in lib/utils/ghash/ghash.cpp in GHASH in AES-GCM. There is a branch instead of an XOR with carry. This was observed for Clang in LLVM 15 on RISC-V. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6056 | 2025-07-08 | N/A | ||
| Timing difference in password reset in Ergon Informatik AG's Airlock IAM 7.7.9, 8.0.8, 8.1.7, 8.2.4 and 8.3.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate usernames. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43546 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2, Windows 11 21h2 and 5 more | 2025-07-08 | 5.6 Medium |
| Windows Cryptographic Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-40732 | 1 Code-projects | 1 Daily Expense Manager | 2025-07-07 | 7.5 High |
| user enumeration vulnerability in Daily Expense Manager v1.0. To exploit this vulnerability a POST request must be sent using the name parameter in /check.php | ||||
| CVE-2024-11297 | 1 Miniorange | 1 Page Restriction | 2025-07-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Page Restriction WordPress (WP) – Protect WP Pages/Post plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.6 via the WordPress core search feature. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data from posts that have been restricted to higher-level roles such as administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46570 | 2 Vllm, Vllm-project | 2 Vllm, Vllm | 2025-06-24 | 2.6 Low |
| vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to version 0.9.0, when a new prompt is processed, if the PageAttention mechanism finds a matching prefix chunk, the prefill process speeds up, which is reflected in the TTFT (Time to First Token). These timing differences caused by matching chunks are significant enough to be recognized and exploited. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.0. | ||||