| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The hiWeb Migration Simple WordPress plugin through 2.0.0.1 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high-privilege users such as admins. |
| The Qubely WordPress plugin before 1.8.5 does not validate and escape some of its block options before outputting them back in a page/post where the block is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks. |
| A Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been found on WIC1200, affecting version 1.1. An authenticated user could store a malicious javascript payload in the device model parameter via '/setup/diags_ir_learn.asp', allowing the attacker to retrieve the session details of another user. |
| Avo is a framework to create admin panels for Ruby on Rails apps. In Avo 3 pre12, any HTML inside text that is passed to `error` or `succeed` in an `Avo::BaseAction` subclass will be rendered directly without sanitization in the toast/notification that appears in the UI on Action completion. A malicious user could exploit this vulnerability to trigger a cross site scripting attack on an unsuspecting user. This issue has been addressed in the 3.3.0 and 2.47.0 releases of Avo. Users are advised to upgrade. |
| This vulnerability exist in Skyworth Router CM5100, version 4.1.1.24, due to insufficient validation of user supplied input for the Time Server 1 parameter at its web interface. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted input to the parameter at the web interface of the vulnerable targeted system.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform stored XSS attacks on the targeted system.
|
| This vulnerability exist in Skyworth Router CM5100, version 4.1.1.24, due to insufficient validation of user supplied input for the Contact Email Address parameter at its web interface. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted input to the parameter at the web interface of the vulnerable targeted system.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform stored XSS attacks on the targeted system.
|
| This vulnerability exist in Skyworth Router CM5100, version 4.1.1.24, due to insufficient validation of user supplied input for the SMTP Username parameter at its web interface. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted input to the parameter at the web interface of the vulnerable targeted system.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform stored XSS attacks on the targeted system.
|
| This vulnerability exist in Skyworth Router CM5100, version 4.1.1.24, due to insufficient validation of user supplied input for the IPsec Tunnel Name parameter at its web interface. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted input to the parameter at the web interface of the vulnerable targeted system.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform stored XSS attacks on the targeted system.
|
| This vulnerability exist in Skyworth Router CM5100, version 4.1.1.24, due to insufficient validation of user supplied input for the L2TP/PPTP Username parameter at its web interface. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted input to the parameter at the web interface of the vulnerable targeted system.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform stored XSS attacks on the targeted system.
|
| This vulnerability exist in Skyworth Router CM5100, version 4.1.1.24, due to insufficient validation of user supplied input for the Device Name parameter at its web interface. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted input to the parameter at the web interface of the vulnerable targeted system.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform stored XSS attacks on the targeted system.
|
| Cross SiteScripting vulnerability in Citrix Session Recording allows attacker to perform Cross Site Scripting |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Macroturk Software and Internet Technologies Macro-Bel allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Macro-Bel: before V.1.0.1.
|
| Inadequate content filtering leads to XSS vulnerabilities in various components. |
| A vulnerability in the legacy chat component of Mitel MiContact Center Business through 10.0.0.4 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient input validation. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to access sensitive information and gain unauthorized access. |
| A DOM based cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component index.html of jstrieb/urlpages before commit 035b647 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript via sending a crafted URL. |
| A DOM based cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component generator.html of tabatkins/railroad-diagrams before commit ea9a123 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript via sending a crafted URL. |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in POSCMS v4.6.2, allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload to /index.php?c=install&m=index&step=2&is_install_db=0. |
| The Inline Related Posts WordPress plugin before 3.8.0 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) |
| The Donation Block For PayPal WordPress plugin through 2.1.0 does not sanitise and escape form submissions, leading to a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability |
| The FormFlow: WhatsApp Social and Advanced Form Builder with Easy Lead Collection WordPress plugin before 2.12.2 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) |
